A new chapter in scholarly publishing. Meet ScholarPal

EDITORIAL & PEER REVIEW

Expertise meets
editorial judgement.

From the first invitation to the final decision, keep the files, people and feedback in the context of the manuscript.

THE EDITOR’S VIEW

Keep the next
decision in view.

A response is due. A report has arrived. A revised file is ready. Give each step a clear place in the editorial process.

Meet the editor workspace
01

Prepare the review

Check the submission and select the file reviewers receive.

02

Connect the expertise

Invite reviewers, follow responses and manage deadlines.

03

Bring feedback together

Read reports, assess revisions and record editorial decisions.

YOUR POLICY, IN PRACTICE

Set the review model.
Keep people responsible.

Single-blind review

Configure the journal’s review model and check which author details are shared.

Double-blind review

Editors check the manuscript, attachments and identifying metadata before sharing the review file.

Open review

Set expectations around identity and transparency according to your journal’s review policy.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

Make room for considered decisions.

Walk through your review process with the ScholarPal team.

Book a walkthrough